Monday 29 January 2018

India seal dramatic win despite series defeat

India seal dramatic win despite series defeat

India beat South Africa by 63 runs to avoid series whitewash and maintain number 1 ranking in Tests. 

Having lost the first two Test matches in Cape Town and Centurion, Virat Kohli and his men were desperate to set things right in Johannesburg. South Africa on the other hand were aiming for a 3-0 series whitewash in order to leapfrog India at the top of the test match rankings. 

It was the Indians who won the toss and decide to bat first on a pitch which looked difficult to bat on and that proved to be the case as the tourists were bundled out for just 187 with Kohli being the top scorer with 54 runs including another crucial 50 runs from Cheteshwar Pujara. 

With a low score on the board, everybody especially the Indian cricket fans thought that this was going to be the same old story as the previous test, but the Indians had other ideas. 

It was India's pace attack who were determined to pull things back and they did so with a stunning performance by a stunning bowling performance from Jasprit Bumrah who took 5 wickets for 54 runs where South Africa could only manage a first innings score of 194, which gave them a slender lead of just 7 runs.  

India then had to bat on a really tricky and worn out pitch, where they managed to get a score of 247 which gave South Africa a target of 240 runs for victory.

The tourists got of to the perfect start with Mohammad Shami removing Aiden Markram who nicked a ball on off stump that bounced more than he expected, Parthiv Patel the man behind the stumps took a good low catch to his right.

The pitch then started to misbehave and put doubts in the batsman's mind. With the score on 17-1, left handed opener Dean Elgar was then struck on the helmet by Bumrah from a ball that was pitched just short of a good length. Because of this,  play had to be called of on the fourth day due to a dangerous pitch. This did not please the Indians at all as they felt that while they were batting, they had to face similar conditions, so why not the Proteas. 

Play did however, resume the following day, after an hour delay due to rain. The proteas managed to see out the  first session with out losing a wicket with the score on 67-1.

Post lunch, Elgar and Hashim Amla steadied the ship for the the first half hour before Amla chipped the ball straight to Hardik Pandya who took a fine catch diving to his right from the bowling of Ishant Sharma.

Ab de Villiers was the next man to go. The number 2 ranked one day batsman received an absolute snorter from Bumrah, which hit his glove and flew straight into the safe hands of Ajinkya Rahane at gully leaving the score on 131-3.

Post de Villiers's wicket, the rest of the South African batting lineup were blown away as India managed to pick up the remaining seven wickets for just 46 runs, sealing a tremendous victory for Kohli and his boys as it was their first Test victory outside the sub-continent since 2014, where they beat England at Lords.         

For his magnificent display of bowling taking 3 crucial wickets in both innings plus a crucial knock of 30 runs, Bhuvneshwar Kumar was accredited man of the match.

Vernon Philander was accredited man of the series for picking up the most wickets in the three Tests.

Kohli was extremely glad to win the final Test in South Africa. 'A lot of people didn't have belief in us but as a team we knew that we were very close in the first two Tests too. We knew that if we played better in pressure-situations than them, then we would win," he said. "And we did that in this Test match. This win was very important from our and the Indian team's point of view, and we were determined to win this match,' 

This is the start of what will be a very important year for team India as they still have two massive tours to both England and Australia. It will be fascinating to see how Kohli and his troops cope with the pressure of attempting to achieve success overseas, especially in the test format, which is something that they will want to put forward in both tours.

Thursday 18 January 2018

The Development of Disability Sport

The Development of Disability Sport

Before the late 1900s Disability sport was considered to be very rare in the world of sport. But after the second world war, when the first Paralympics were held in 1960 in Rome, there was a possibility that the severely injured soldiers who had survived the war, could still achieve something in their lives, especially in sport. This was the turning point for sport and disability to come together as another identity sports participation.

According to 'Sport England', disability sport is still facing some barriers even though it plays a major role for sport in the UK. One of the barriers is coaching in the sense that it is sometimes difficult fo a coach to teach and monitor a group of physically disabled people than it is for a group of able bodied people for reasons such as health and safety. But since the 2012 Paralympic Games, this has changed drastically.

Whether it's do with funding for coaches or something similar, this seams to be one of the main issues discussed quite frequently in the disability sports world. According to prospectus .ac.uk, the average salary for a Senior Sports Coach who is employed under national governing bodies is between £30,000 and £35,000. The average salary for newly qualified Sports Coaches is from £15,000 to £25,000 and for amateur coaches it starts from £10.

A wide range of disabled people such as myself have competed in a variety of disability sports such as wheelchair football, basketball and Boccia, which is a sport similar to bowls. Participating in sports gives disabled people the freedom to express themselves and to show people who they are as an individual in regards to playing sport.

I remember taking part in the 'Panathlon Challenge', which is a national charity competition which was originally set up by Businessman and Philanthropist Jack Petchey for schools with special needs students from all over London to come and showcase their skills and abilities in regards to sports participation. This event is like a mini Paralympic games, which one lasts one whole day. Each special needs school from each borough of London e.g Croydon and Bromley come together and compete against each other in a series of Paralympic sport related games. This includes sports such as: Boccia, New Age Kurling, Polybat (disabled version of table tennis) and Table Cricket(specially adapted cricket for Cerebral Palsy)which is the sport I competed in during those events and obtained four medals,  one gold, one sliver, one bronze and one for 5th place.

Many people such as myself can learn a lot about sports and especially sports participation by attending these events. it is a great opportunity to collaborate as well as competing with other athletes who have similar disabilities. Having participated in these events, I was able to believe that anything possible in sport and no matter who you are, you can still achieve success in life. 

One of my early memories of sports participation was the first and only time I met the Queen, which at the London Youth Games in 2002,  I was astonished when I heard that her Majesty will be giving out the medals when my school won the Regional B
occia Championships which were prat of the Youth Games. We were even on the front page of the local newspaper so for me, this has to be one of my best memories in sports participation.

One of the more common disability sports is wheelchair basketball in which I have had ago at. It may not have the same pace as a regular basketball game, but for me, it was quite satisfying to have a go at, as it is good to experiment and try different things. This enables you to judge who you are as an individual and find out what you are good at and what areas do you need to improve on in terms of participating in sports.   

One of the biggest barriers that occur in disability sport is its popularity in the sense that other than the Paralympics, you rarely get to see any disability sports events on television as you do for regular Olympic sports such as athletics and football, you have to either stream it online or attend a live event. This is largely to do with the lack of global interest in Paralympic sport. It is quite rare that you see a disabled person only watching disability sports, they are pretty much like regular sports fans who enjoy watching regular sports such as football or cricket.   

On the plus side, it's good to see that disabled people such as myself are still willing to be involved in sport, as we have the passion and desire to do so. There is no point getting into sports without the desire to succeed and enjoy it, and that's why I love it. 

Thursday 11 January 2018

Is VAR improving football?

Is VAR improving football?


Over the past years, professional football has witnessed some controversial decisions on the pitch. From disallowed goals to harsh sending offs. The game is desperately trying to resolve these issues from getting out of control.    

In last night's goalless Carabao Cup semi-final first leg tie between Arsenal and Chelsea at Stamford Bridge, there was an incident inside Arsenal's penalty box where Chelsea's Cesc Fabregas was brought down by Arsenal's Danny Welbeck. However,  referee  Martin Atkinson's decision to not award a penalty to the Blues was backed up by the newly introduced Video Assistant Referee system which is currently a trial in progress. 

It is said that the whole point of VAR was put in place to avoid giving wrong decisions in which are obvious according to the rules of the game this includes: goals, direct red cards or mistaken identity as was the case with Kieran Gibbs when it really was Alex Oxlaide-Chamberlin who should have been sent off for Arsenal against Chelsea four seasons ago.   

Chelsea boss Antonio Conte praised the new Video Assistant Referee system which was in use for the second time since it was introduced.  "I am very positive about VAR because when there is a big doubt during the game it is right the referee and the other referee watch the video to check and make the best decision,"

Conte also added "I think everyone wants less mistakes during the game and I think this could be very positive for sure." 

Gunners boss Arsene Wenger was also in favour of the VAR system "It was . It was a cause of anxiety as it took a bit of time to make the second decision with Welbeck and Fabregas, but overall it worked well."But between the penalty action or penalty not action, with the time taken it would have been strange to come back to the penalty."

The quotes from both managers sums up the positive side of using the new VAR system, but are there any negatives? You could supposedly say that time could be a factor but on the other hand if the referee and video assistant referee are quick enough to make the right  decision, this should not be a factor at all.  

On the plus side, everybody seams to be happy with the goal-line technology system as their are no longer any huge debates or controversies regarding goals and goals which have been  disallowed when the ball has clearly crossed the line.

So, is there really a case to say that VAR is improving football? The answer right now is it yes probably is, although this is still largely debatable as  Crystal Palace supporters may argue that Glen Murray's goal should not have stood as it looked as if the former Palace striker may have handled the ball, but referee Andre Marriner chose to let the goal stand after consulting with his video assistant about the hand-ball incident.

Maybe this is a case of the FA looking back at their decision to introduce VAR and to continue to monitor its progress to see if it really works out or not. Only then we can prove that it works out or not.       





Tuesday 9 January 2018

FA cup 4th Round Preview